Close companies face additional reporting requirements

Further administrative changes are on the cards for close companies, as the Government seeks to gain a better understanding of previously difficult-to-distinguish transactions.


Close companies – those companies controlled by five or fewer participators or by their directors if those directors are participators – may soon need to disclose details of transactions with participators in order to stay compliant.


A full definition of who qualifies as a participator can be found in CTM60107, but they will generally be shareholders or directors.


A business is controlled by a participator when the participator has voting power, share capital of the company and rights to capital on winding up.


It is worth understanding which transactions may be impacted and how this could change reporting requirements.


Which reporting requirements might change?


The proposed changes will cover a range of transactions, including:

  • Cash withdrawals
  • Loans
  • Debts
  • Dividends
  • Other distributions and transfers of assets to and from the company


It will exclude items that are already reported to HMRC, meaning that the changes will not result in a doubling up of administrative tasks.


To comply with the changes, close companies must provide details concerning the amount transacted, the date and the details of the recipient, including their name, address and national insurance number.


Why are these changes being introduced?


There is no guarantee that these changes will be introduced, as they are currently under public consultation.


However, there is a belief that transactions between close companies and their participators may be an area that is vulnerable to tax loss due to high levels of error and fraud.


Small businesses are seen as being particularly vulnerable to the tax gap, i.e. the difference between the amount of tax owed and the amount collected. They continue to be the focus of scrutiny and tax reform.


As these proposals are still under consultation, there is no clear indication of how and when the reports will need to be made.


The anticipated implementation will see the establishment of an annual reporting cycle that will be tied to the existing company tax return.


This should mean that the obligations will be easier to track, as they will not be an additional requirement.


Our team can help you understand your obligations and keep you updated on the outcome of the consultation.


Speak to our team to take the stress out of company tax compliance. 

The hidden savings tax trap and why changes to ISAs make it harder to put money away

By Charlie Flockhart • June 4, 2026
Do you know what your Personal Savings Allowance is? While most taxpayers in the UK will know the thresholds for Income Tax, a worrying few know the way in which personal savings can be subject to tax. With ISAs set for a significant overhaul, understanding the less tax-efficient saving options will soon be more important. How much tax do you pay on your savings? While your savings are not taxed, any interest generated by those savings could be subject to tax if it exceeds your Personal Savings Allowance. Depending on the rate of Income Tax you pay, your Personal Savings Allowance will differ. The thresholds are: £1,000 for Basic-rate taxpayers £500 for Higher-rate taxpayers £0 for Additional-rate taxpayers ISAs remain the more tax-efficient saving strategy as the interest generated from them is tax-free. It is therefore most effective to utilise the full £20,000 saving limit for an ISA as early in the tax year as possible to benefit the most from the accumulation of interest. How should tax on savings be managed? The main issue is that tax on savings is often overlooked, resulting in HMRC taking action for underpaid taxes. This will often manifest in a charge through PAYE, as employees are more likely to overlook this obligation. Those filing Self Assessment tax returns should already be declaring interest earned, so any compliance issue in that group points to a wider problem with handling tax obligations. When attempting to make the most of saving strategies, it is best to seek professional financial advice. This will be more important if the saving limit for Cash ISAs falls to £12,000 for under-65s in 2027 as proposed, leaving younger savers to have to find new ways to grow their wealth. Our professional team can help you to determine an effective saving strategy that suits your financial goals while helping you to be mindful of the tax obligations that you may face. We do not want to see anyone caught off-guard by an unexpected tax bill and understanding your exposure is vital for preventing this. Get in touch with our team to regain confidence in your saving strategy.

Salary sacrifice cap and the squeezed middle

By Charlie Flockhart • June 4, 2026
The £2,000 cap on National Insurance (NI) free salary sacrifice pension contributions was sold as a tax on high earners but, if you look closer, the opposite is true. In fact, the people most exposed are middle-income savers and the small businesses that employ them. For the so-called “squeezed middle”, it is yet another quiet hit to take. Why do the rules adversely affect middle-earners? From April 2029, salary sacrifice tax relief will continue to be available, but only the first £2,000 of employee pension contributions each year will be free of NI. Anything above that becomes liable to NI for both the employee and the employer and the full adverse effect is clear once the different rates of NI are accounted for. If a person’s total pension contributions are modest, say up to six per cent, those individuals who earn between £35,000 and £50,270 will pay an eight per cent NI charge on pension contributions above the £2,000 cap. By contrast, an individual whose earnings already exceed the upper earnings limit of £50,270 will pay employee NI at just two per cent on those same excess contributions. This imbalance in the NI system means that those on lower incomes could pay four times the NI rate on their pension savings in excess of the new threshold than the highest earners pay. How does this change affect employers’ National Insurance bills? Many employers currently share their own NI savings by topping up staff pensions, but a new 15 per cent employer NI charge on contributions above the cap makes those top-ups unaffordable for a lot of firms. As a result, some employees could see the overall efficiency of their pension saving above the cap fall by as much as 23 per cent once lost top-ups are counted. Even those who stay below the threshold are not safe, as the Office for Budget Responsibility (OBR) estimates that around 76 per cent of higher employer costs are eventually passed back to staff through weaker pay rises and trimmed benefits. Don’t wait for the change The good news is that there is time to plan, as the rules do not take effect until April 2029, which leaves room to act while current allowances still apply. If you are a middle earner, this is exactly the moment to review your pension strategy, weigh up complementary options such as ISAs and make sure your retirement plans stay on track. To talk through what the salary sacrifice cap means for you, please get in touch with our team.

Government summer savings spree adds complexity to VAT for hospitality and tourism

By Charlie Flockhart • June 4, 2026
When Rachel Reeves announced a temporary cut in VAT from 20 per cent to five per cent for family attractions and children’s dining over the summer holidays, the hospitality and leisure sectors broadly welcomed it. The scheme runs from 25 June to 1 September and is funded, according to the Treasury, by closing a tax loophole used by oil and gas companies with overseas operations. On the surface, this looks like good news worth welcoming. However, for the businesses applying the new rules, the reality of delivering the rate cut is more complicated than the headlines suggest. The rules shift from one service to the next How the cut works depends heavily on what is being sold. Admission tickets to amusement parks, water parks, zoos, museums, soft play and similar venues qualify, as do children’s and family tickets to cinemas, theatres and concerts. However, pay-per-ride attractions do not. Children’s meals only qualify when served from a clearly marketed, separate children’s menu. A smaller portion of an adult dish does not count, nor does a discounted adult meal or a takeaway. Season tickets and annual passes are generally excluded too. The result is that many businesses will apply two VAT rates at once on the same bill. Tills, accounting systems and front-of-house staff all need to handle that from day one, then revert again from 1 September. This adds an additional layer of complexity to VAT reporting that businesses need to consider right away. Encouraged, but not required The Government has urged businesses to pass the saving on to customers and the Competition and Markets Authority has new anti-profiteering powers to prevent unethical activity. Even so, there is no legal obligation to lower prices at the till and many businesses will weigh up rebuilding margin, reinvesting and matching competitors before deciding exactly what savings to offer to consumers. Given the wider cost challenges that businesses currently face, the scheme may not deliver the lift at the till that many customers are expecting. Right idea, wrong season? There is also a question of timing. The scheme targets the period when families already spend most on days out and when operators are near capacity. A cut would arguably do more for businesses in the quieter autumn and winter months. As designed, it looks more like household support than business stimulus. Any support for the sector is welcome, provided businesses seek the expert guidance required to manage obligations and make the most of any new opportunities. If you would like to discuss what the temporary VAT cut means for your business, please get in touch with our team.